CourtListener 10154844•State v. Palmer
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
George Palmer, Appellant.
Appeal From Georgetown County
Edward B. Cottingham, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-014
Submitted January 1, 2008 Filed January
9, 2008
APPEAL DISMISSED
Assistant Appellant Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor J. Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: George
Palmer appeals his conviction for breach of trust with fraudulent intent of an
amount greater than $5000 and sentence of ten years imprisonment, suspended
upon the service of seven years and three years probation. Palmer contends the
trial court erred in failing to grant his motion for a directed verdict. After a thorough review of the record and counsels
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Palmers appeal and grant counsels motion to be relieved.
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
ANDERSON,
SHORT and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.