State v. Young

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Tommy Young, Appellant.

Appeal From Jasper County

 Perry M. Buckner, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-013

Submitted January 1, 2008 – Filed January
9, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia; Tommy Young, of
Ridgeville, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
Office of the Attorney General, all of Columbia; I. McDuffie Stone, III, of
Hampton; for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Tommy
Young appeals his convictions for armed robbery and possession of a weapon
during the commission of a violent crime, arguing the trial court erred by not
granting a mistrial.  In his pro se brief, Young also objects to
the admission of a witness’ testimony, argues his due process rights were
violated, and alleges his trial counsel was ineffective.  After a thorough
review of the record, Young’s pro se brief, and counsel’s brief
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

ANDERSON,
SHORT and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.