State v. Gelzer

CourtListener 10154832Scctapp10 de jan. de 2008

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In the Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Dwayne Gelzer Appellant.

Appeal from Charleston County

Daniel F. Pieper,
Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2008-UP-031

Submitted January 2, 2008 – Filed January 10, 2008

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate
Defender Eleanor Duffy Cleary, South Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense,
Division of Appellate Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Ralph E. Hoisington, of Charleston, for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM:  Dwayne Gelzer
appeals his conviction of possession of marijuana and sentence of one year
imprisonment, suspended upon service of four months and two years probation. 
He maintains the trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed
verdict.  After a thorough review of the
record and counsel’s brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Gelzer’s appeal and grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HEARN, C.J.,
KITTREDGE and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.