State v. Sturkey

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Darrell Lewis
Sturkey, Appellant.

Appeal From Greenville County

 C. Victor Pyle, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2008-UP-019

Submitted January 1, 2008 – Filed January
10, 2008   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Aileen P. Clare, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all
of Columbia, Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Darrell
Lewis Sturkey appeals his
convictions for assault and battery with
intent to kill, attempted armed robbery, and first-degree burglary.  On appeal,
Sturkey contends the trial court erred by denying his motion for a directed
verdict.  After a thorough
review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Sturkey’s pro se brief
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel’s motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED. [1]

ANDERSON,
SHORT, and WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.