State v. Hippenstiel

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD
NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Carolyn Ann Hippenstiel, Appellant.
__________

Appeal From Colleton County
Perry M. Buckner, Circuit Court Judge
__________

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-347
Submitted May 1, 2012 – Filed June 6, 2012
__________

APPEAL DISMISSED
__________

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott,
all of Columbia; and Solicitor Isaac McDuffie Stone,
III, of Beaufort, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Carolyn Ann Hippenstiel appeals her convictions of
possession of a stolen vehicle and failure to stop for a blue light, arguing the
circuit court erred in accepting her guilty plea for possession of a stolen
vehicle because no evidence indicated Hippenstiel received the vehicle from
someone who stole the vehicle. After a thorough review of the record and
counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and
State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the
appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.1

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PIEPER, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.