CourtListener 10154768•SCDSS v. Marlena A.
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Marlena A., Jermaine P., Defendants,
In the interest of a minor under the age of 18.
Case # 2011-DR-23-1696
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Marlena A., Kevin B., Defendants,
Of whom Marlena A. is the Appellant.
In the interest of a minor under the age of 18.
Appellate Case No. 2011-199331
Appeal From Greenville County
Rochelle Y. Conits, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-358
Submitted June 1, 2012 – Filed June 13, 2012
AFFIRMED
Alex Kornfeld, of Greenville, for Appellant.
Deborah Murdock, of Mauldin, for Respondent.
Robert A. Clark, of Greenville, for Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Marlena A. appeals from the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-
2570 (2010 & Supp. 2011). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues that warrant
briefing. Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.
AFFIRMED.1
PIEPER, KONDUROS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.