CourtListener 10154721•State v. Brewer
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Keoshaws
Brewer, Appellant.
Appeal From Sumter County
Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-271
Submitted March 1, 2012 Filed May 2,
2012
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Breen Richard Stevens,
of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Ernest A. Finney, III, of Sumter,
for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Keoshaws Brewer appeals her convictions for
shoplifting and failure to stop for a blue light, arguing the trial court erred
in failing to provide the mere presence jury charge and shifting the burden of
proof from the State on the reasonable doubt jury charge. After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
FEW, C.J., and HUFF and
SHORT, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.