State v. Johnson

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Trevis Eugene
Johnson, Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County

Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2012-UP-244 

Submitted April 2, 2012 – Filed April 25,
2012

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Wanda H. Carter, of
Columbia; and Trevis Eugene Johnson, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Senior Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor J. Strom Thurmond, Jr., of
Aiken, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Trevis Eugene Johnson appeals his conviction of trafficking in
cocaine, arguing the circuit court erred in denying his motion for a directed
verdict because the State failed to prove he had actual or constructive
possession of the drugs.  Additionally, Johnson asserts several pro se
arguments.  After a thorough review of the record and briefs
pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v.
Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

PIEPER, KONDUROS, and
GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.