State v. Hargett

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Kenneth Hargett, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2012-UP-094

Submitted February 1, 2012 – Filed
February 22, 2012

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of
Columbia; and Kenneth Hargett, pro se, for Appellant.

Teresa A. Knox, Tommy Evans, Jr., and J.
Benjamin Aplin, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Kenneth Hargett appeals his probation revocation, arguing the circuit court erred in revoking
probation in full based on Hargett's failure to avoid being near minors under
the age of eighteen and failure to actively participate in and thereby be
terminated from his counseling/treatment program.  After a thorough
review of the record and briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's
motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

WILLIAMS,
THOMAS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.