In the Interest of Leandra M.

CourtListener 10154463Scctapp29 de fev. de 2012

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

In the Interest
of Leandra M., a Juvenile Under the Age of Seventeen, Appellant.

Appeal From Lexington County

Richard W. Chewning, III, Family Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-135

Submitted February 1, 2012 – Filed
February 29, 2012   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Donald V. Myers, of Lexington, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Leandra M. appeals the family court's
decision ordering her to attend school, arguing the State failed to prove she
did not comply with the family court's previous order.  After a thorough review
of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's
motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

PIEPER, KONDUROS, and
GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.