CourtListener 10154448•State v. King
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Eliana King, Appellant.
Appeal From Horry County
Steven H. John, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2012-UP-126
Submitted February 1, 2012 Filed
February 29, 2012
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor J. Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Eliana King appeals her guilty plea,
arguing the circuit court erred in accepting her plea when her prolonged
detention and questioning by the police exceeded the scope of the initial
traffic stop and violated her constitutional rights. After a thorough
review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
PIEPER, KONDUROS, and
GEATHERS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.