State v. Workman

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

 

v.

Kenneth  M. Workman, Appellant.

Appeal From Greenville County

C. Victor Pyle, Jr., Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2012-UP-048

Submitted January 3, 2012 – Filed January
25, 2012 

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant, of
Columbia; for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor W. Walter Wilkins, III, of
Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Kenneth Workman appeals his conviction for armed
robbery, possession of a weapon during the commission of a violent crime,
conspiracy, and assault and battery.  In his Anders brief, Workman
argues the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress the victim's
identification and erred in preventing him from questioning the State's witness
about the sentence he received on cross-examination.  Additionally, Workman
filed a pro se brief.  After a thorough review
of the record and briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we
dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

SHORT,
WILLIAMS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.