State v. Webb

CourtListener 10154320Scctapp20 de dez. de 2011

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jeffrey Webb, Appellant.

Appeal From Oconee County

 Alexander S. Macaulay, Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-566

Submitted December 1, 2011 – Filed
December 20, 2011

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy Attorney General John
W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W. Elliott, all of
Columbia; and Solicitor Christina T. Adams, of Anderson, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Jeffrey
Webb appeals his convictions of two counts of armed robbery and two counts of possession
of a weapon during the commission of a violent crime, arguing the circuit court
erred in refusing to charge the jury on the credibility of an accomplice's
testimony.  After a thorough
review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

HUFF, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.