CourtListener 10154265•SCDSS v. Shannon
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina
Department of Social Services, Respondent,
v.
Shannon S. G.,
James D. S. AKA Darryl S., and John Doe, Defendants,
Of whom Shannon
S. G. is the Appellant.
In the
interest of a minor child under the age of 18 years.
Appeal From Darlington County
Roger E. Henderson, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-431
Submitted October 1, 2011 Filed October
10, 2011
AFFIRMED
Penny Hays Cauly, of Florence, for Appellant.
Elizabeth Biggerstaff York, of Hartsville, for Respondent.
Robbie Forrester Gardner, III, of Hartsville, for Guardian ad
Litem.
PER CURIAM: Shannon
S. G. appeals from the family court's
final order terminating her parental rights to her child. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2010). Upon a
thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and
conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly,
we affirm the family court's ruling.
AFFIRMED.[1]
HUFF,
PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.