Jackson v. Thomas

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

Ris'e D.
Jackson, Sheena Sophia Jackson, and Joel Barry Jackson, II, Respondents,

v.

Michael Shawn
Thomas, Alex J. Newton, Household Asset Co., Inc., Defendants,

Of whom Michael
Shawn Thomas and Household Asset Co., Inc. are Appellants.

Appeal From Greenville County

 Charles B. Simmons, Jr., Master In Equity

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-450

Submitted October 1, 2011 – Filed October
11, 2011   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Zandra L. Johnson, of Greenville, for
Appellants.

David Charles Alford, of Spartanburg, for
Respondents.

PER CURIAM: Michael Shawn Thomas and Household Asset Company, Inc. appeal the
circuit court's granting of a motion to restore the matter to the active trial
docket.  Because the order on appeal grants a motion to restore, it is not a
final judgment and is not immediately appealable.  See Shields v.
Martin Marietta Corp., 303 S.C. 469, 470, 402 S.E.2d 482, 483 (1991)
("The decision on a motion to restore the case to the active docket is not
a final judgment and is interlocutory and, therefore, not immediately
appealable.").  Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

SHORT,
WILLIAMS, and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.