Roe v. SCDSS

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

John Roe and Jane Roe, Respondents,

v.

South Carolina Department

of Social Services, Lisa S.,

Edward C., Ray H., Michael
C., Pedro A.V., and John Doe, Defendants,

Of whom Lisa S. is theAppellant.

In the interest of a minor child under the age of 18.

Appeal From Greenville County

Rochelle Y. Conits, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-420

Submitted September 1, 2011 – Filed September 9, 2011   

AFFIRMED

Andrew
R. Havran, of Greer, for Appellant.

Vanessa
Kormylo, of Greenville, for Respondents.

Robert
A. Clark, of Greenville, for Guardian ad Litem.

Deborah
Murdock, of Mauldin, for South Carolina Department of Social Services.

PER
CURIAM: Lisa S. appeals the family court's final order terminating
her parental rights to her minor child.  See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570
(2010).  Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of facts and
conclusions of law, pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. 
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.[1]

HUFF, PIEPER,
and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.