State v. Flowers

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Carmichael Trevon Flowers, Appellant.

Appeal From Florence County

Ralph King Anderson, Jr., Special Circuit
Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2011-UP-404

Submitted August 15, 2011 – Filed August
25, 2011 

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H.
Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Edgar L. Clements, III, of Florence, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Carmichael
Trevon Flowers appeals his convictions for malicious injury to real property,
malicious injury to personal property, and criminal domestic violence, arguing
the trial court erred in allowing his trial counsel to continue to represent
him after he indicated a desire to waive his right to counsel and proceed pro
se.  Additionally, Flowers asserts numerous pro se arguments.  After a thorough
review of the record and all briefs pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

HUFF, PIEPER, and LOCKEMY,
JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.