CourtListener 10153987•State v. Hall
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Tarrence Derrel
Hall, Appellant.
Appeal From Greenville County
G. Edward Welmaker, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-250
Submitted May 1, 2011 Filed May 24, 2011
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Alan M. Wilson, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor W. Walter Wilkins, of Greenville,
for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Tarrence
Derrel Hall appeals his convictions for resisting arrest with a deadly weapon,
failing to stop for a blue light, possessing marijuana, and operating a vehicle
without a driver's license. He argues the circuit court erred in denying his
motion for a new trial. After a thorough
review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL DISMISSED.
FEW, C.J., CURETON and
GOOLSBY A.J.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.