State v. Nelson

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent

v.

Lateeshe Antonio Nelson, Appellant

Appeal From Clarendon County

Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-238

Submitted May 1, 2011 – Filed May 24, 2011   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan M. Wilson, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley
W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Ernest A. Finney, III, of Sumter,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Lateeshe
Antonio Nelson appeals his conviction for distribution of crack cocaine,
arguing the trial court erred in allowing testimony of a prior bad act.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

SHORT, KONDUROS, and
GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.