State v. Bey

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Khalil Faqir Bey, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.   2011-UP-153

Submitted April 1, 2011 – Filed April 12,
2011

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant,
of Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Khalil
Faqir Bey appeals the revocation of his probation, arguing the circuit court
erred in revoking his probation without holding a full evidentiary hearing.  After a thorough review of the record, counsel's brief,
and Bey's pro se brief, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we
dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

HUFF, SHORT, and PIEPER,
JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.