SCDSS v. Tricia M.

CourtListener 10153909Scctapp8 de mar. de 2011

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina
Department of Social Services, Respondent,

v.

Tricia M., Paul
M., Defendants,

Of whom Tricia M.
is the Appellant.

In the interest of a minor under the age of 18.

Appeal From Greenville County

Robert N. Jenkins, Sr., Family Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-090

Submitted March 1, 2011 – Filed March 8,
2011   

AFFIRMED

Melissa S. Van Emburg, of Greenville, for
Appellant.

Kaye Davis, of Mauldin, for Respondent.

Robert A. Clark, of Greenville, for
Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Tricia
M. appeals the family court's order terminating parental rights to her minor
child.  Upon a thorough
review of the record and the family court's findings of fact and conclusions of
law pursuant to Ex Parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987),
we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.  Accordingly, we affirm[1] the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.

WILLIAMS,
KONDUROS, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.