SCDSS v. Candida A.

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina
Department of Social Services, Respondent,

   v.

Candida A.,
James A., and John Doe, Defendants,

Of whom Candida
A. and James A. are the Appellants.

In the interest of four minor children under the age of 18.

Appeal From Sumter County

George M. McFaddin, Jr., Family Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2011-UP-053

Submitted February 1, 2011 – Filed
February 10, 2011   

AFFIRMED

Willie H. Brunson, of Sumter, for Appellant Candida A.

Everett J. Mercer, of Sumter, for Appellant James A.

Deborah T. Nielsen, of Sumter, for Respondent.

Deborah Dawson, of Sumter, Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Candida
A. and James A. both appeal from the
family court's final order terminating their parental rights to their minor
children.  See S.C.
Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (2010).  Upon a thorough review of the record and the
family court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex Parte
Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues
warrant briefing.  Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED.[1]

WILLIAMS
and KONDUROS, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur.       

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.