In the Matter of Don R. Boyd

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

In the Matter
of the Care and Treatment of Don R. Boyd, Sr., Appellant.

Appeal From Aiken County

Doyet A. Early, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.   2011-UP-068

Submitted February 1, 2011 – Filed
February 16, 2011

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender LaNelle Cantey DuRant,
of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Attorney General Deborah R.J.
Shupe, Assistant Attorney General R. Westmoreland Clarkson, and Assistant
Attorney General William M. Blitch, Jr., all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Don
R. Boyd, Sr. appeals his commitment to the South Carolina Department of Mental
Health pursuant to a jury's finding he was a sexually violent predator under
the Sexually Violent Predator Act.  He argues the trial court erred in limiting
his recross-examination of an expert witness.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b)(1), SCACR, and the following authority: State v.
China, 312 S.C. 335, 342, 440 S.E.2d 382, 385-86 (Ct. App. 1993) (holding
that in the absence of a proffer of
excluded testimony, an argument that a trial court erred by permitting redirect
examination but not recross is not preserved for appeal).

AFFIRMED.

FEW, C.J., KONDUROS, J.,
and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.