In The Matter of Cedric White

CourtListener 10153806Scctapp24 de jan. de 2011

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

In The Matter
Of The Care And Treatment Of Cedric Leandra White, Appellant.

Appeal From Charleston County

Deadra L. Jefferson, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2011-UP-009 

Submitted January 1, 2011 – Filed January
24, 2011

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender LaNelle C. DuRant, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Alan Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Deborah R. J. Shupe, all of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Cedric
Leandra White appeals his commitment to the South Carolina Department of Mental
Health under the Sexually Violent Predator Act.  White argues the trial court
erred by improperly relying on Dr. Schwartz-Watt's diagnosis of an unspecified
sexual disorder during his second evaluation even though she had previously
found he did not meet the definition of a sexually violent predator.  After a thorough review of the record and
counsel's brief, pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), In
re McCoy, 360 S.C. 425, 427, 602 S.E.2d 58, 59 (2004) (adopting the Anders procedure for alleged no-merit appeals in sexually violent predator involuntary
commitment appeals), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., SHORT and
WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.