CourtListener 10153719•State v. Salley
Texto completo
THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Jason E.
Salley, Appellant.
Appeal From Spartanburg County
Thomas W. Cooper, Jr., Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-479
Submitted November 1, 2010 Filed November
4, 2010
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Jason E. Salley appeals his probation
revocation, arguing the probation revocation court abused its discretion in
revoking his probation. After a thorough
review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
FEW, C.J., SHORT and
WILLIAMS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.