State v. Honeycutt

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

James
Honeycutt, Appellant.

Appeal From Horry County

 Benjamin H. Culbertson, Circuit Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-492

Submitted November 1,2010 – Filed November
8, 2010

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, all of Columbia; and Solicitor J. Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  James Honeycutt appeals his second-degree criminal
sexual conduct with a minor conviction and corresponding sentence, arguing the
trial court erred in denying his motion for a directed verdict.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

HUFF, KONDUROS, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.