State v. Dade

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Eric Jermole
Dade, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

 John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-444

Submitted October 1, 2010 – Filed October
14, 2010   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Elizabeth A. Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER
CURIAM: Eric Jermole Dade appeals the
revocation of his probation, arguing the trial court committed an abuse of
discretion by revoking his probation.  After
a thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams,
305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Dade's appeal and grant counsel's petition to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., HUFF and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.