State v. Inman

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Quinton Inman, Appellant.

Appeal From Marion County

 Thomas A. Russo, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-457

Submitted October 1, 2010 – Filed October
21, 2010   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Appellate Defender Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia; and
Quinton Inman, pro se, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J.
Zelenka, of Columbia; and Solicitor Edgar Lewis Clements, III, of Florence, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Quinton Inman
was convicted of murder and sentenced to life without parole.  Inman appeals,
arguing the trial court committed reversible error in failing to instruct the
jury on the law of accessory after the fact.  Inman filed a pro se brief,
arguing the trial court erred by (1) making comments on the credibility of the
witnesses during jury instructions and (2) instructing jurors on the "hand
of one is the hand of all" theory.  After a thorough review of the record and both briefs pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to
be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., HUFF
and GEATHERS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.