State v. Grant

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

D'el Jvon
Grant, Appellant.

Appeal From Charleston County

Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2010-UP-388

Submitted August 2, 2010 – Filed August
25, 2010

APPEAL DISMISSED

Chief Appellate Defender Robert M. Dudek, of Columbia, for
Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J.
Zelenka, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Scarlett Anne Wilson, of Charleston,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:   D'el Jvon Grant appeals his two murder
convictions.  Grant argues the trial court erred in allowing a witness to testify
that he promised to tell the truth as a part of his agreement with the State because
it impermissibly bolstered his credibility.  Grant also filed a pro se brief,
arguing the trial court erred in failing to grant his motion for a directed
verdict.  After a thorough review of the
record, counsel's brief, and Grant's pro se brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Grant's appeal and grant counsel's petition to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

FEW, C.J., KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.