State v. Gadson

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Shawn T.
Gadson, Appellant.

Appeal From Beaufort County

D. Garrison Hill, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-268

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed May 6,
2010

APPEAL DISMISSED

Deputy Chief Appellate Defender Wanda H.
Carter, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; Solicitor William Benjamin Rogers, Jr., of Bennettsville,
for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Shawn T. Gadson appeals his convictions
and sentences for burglary and larceny.  He contends the trial court erred in
refusing to grant his motion for a continuance.  After a thorough review of the
record, counsel's brief, and Gadson's pro se brief pursuant to Anders
v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Gadson's appeal and grant counsel's petition to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS,
and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.