State v. Cameron

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Joshua James Cameron, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

 John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-184

Submitted March 1, 2010 – Filed March 2,
2010  

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

John Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Joshua James Cameron appeals the
imposition of global positioning satellite monitoring following the revocation
of his probation, arguing the circuit court erred in hearing the State's motion
to reconsider, which was filed after the expiration of the term of court during
which Cameron's probation was revoked.  We affirm[1] pursuant to
Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities:  Rule 29(a), SCRCrimP (permitting
a party to a criminal action to file post-trial motions within ten days from
the date sentence was imposed, and exempting hearing of such motions from the
rule that criminal matters may not be heard after the end of the term of court
during which judgment was rendered); State v. Campbell, 376 S.C. 212,
215, 656 S.E.2d 371, 373 (2008) (recognizing Rule 29(a), SCRCrimP, enunciates
two exceptions to the general rule that the circuit court "is without
jurisdiction to consider a criminal matter once the term of court during which
judgment was entered expires"). 

AFFIRMED.

PIEPER and GEATHERS,
JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.