State v. Chan Bun

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL
VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Chan S. Bun, Appellant.

Appeal From Sparanburg County

Lee S. Alford, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-069

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed February 1, 2010  

APPEAL DISMISSED

Acting Chief Appellate Attorney Robert M. Dudek, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy
Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald
J. Zelenka, all of Columbia; and Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.

 PER CURIAM: Chan S. Bun appeals
his conviction for murder and two counts of assault with intent to kill.  Bun
asserts the trial court erred in allowing the State to re-open its case based
on an alleged ambiguity in the testimony of Sok Bun.  After a thorough review
of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386
U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357
(1991), we dismiss Bun's appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS, and KONDUROS, JJ.,
concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.