State v. Jimmy Duncan

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jimmy Lee
Duncan, Appellant.

Appeal From Colleton County

Perry M. Buckner, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-074

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed February
1, 2010   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

John Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Jimmy
Lee Duncan appeals his probation revocation, arguing the proceeding was so
summary that the record is insufficient for appellate review.  After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS,
and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.