CourtListener 10153374•State v. Henry Baker
Texto completo
THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Henry Amos
Baker, Appellant.
Appeal From York County
Kristi Lee Harrington, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-082
Submitted January 4, 2010 Filed February
2, 2010
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellate Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, of
Columbia, for Appellant.
J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for
Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Henry
Amos Baker appeals the revocation of his probation. Baker contends the trial
court erred by revoking his probation on the grounds that he failed to pay
fines or restitution. After
a thorough review of the record, and counsel's brief, pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967) and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116,
406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be
relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
SHORT, THOMAS,
and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.