State v. Ronnie Middleton

CourtListener 10153339Scctapp8 de fev. de 2010

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Ronnie
Middleton, Appellant.

Appeal From Greenville County

G. Edward Welmaker, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-113

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed February
8, 2010   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Acting Chief Appellate Defender Robert M.
Dudek, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster,
Chief Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, and  Assistant Deputy Attorney
General Salley W. Elliott, of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert M. Ariail, of
Greenville, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Ronnie
Middleton appeals his kidnapping conviction and corresponding life without
parole sentence.  Middleton argues the trial court erred in refusing to grant a
directed verdict on the charge of kidnapping.   After a thorough review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss the appeal and
grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL DISMISSED. 

WILLIAMS,
PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.