State v. Kenneth Rogers

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Kenneth Rogers, Appellant.

Appeal From Darlington County

Howard P. King, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-119

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed February
11, 2010   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender M. Celia Robinson, of
Columbia, for Appellant.

J. Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Kenneth Rogers appeals the revocation of his probation.  Rogers
argues the circuit court erred in revoking his probation   based on a
previously resolved violation.  After a
thorough review of the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Williams, Pieper,
and Lockemy, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.