State v. Michael Douglas

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Michael Rachan Douglas, Appellant.

Appeal From York County

 John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No.  2010-UP-124

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed February
11, 2010

AFFIRMED

Appellate Defender Elizabeth Franklin-Best,
of Columbia, for Appellant.

Assistant Chief Legal Counsel John
Benjamin Aplin, of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Michael R. Douglas appeals the revocation of his probation. Specifically,
Douglas alleges he was a contributing member of society at the time of his
arrest and the probation court abused its discretion by revoking his
probation.  We affirm[1] pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and State v. Lee, 350 S.C. 125, 130, 564
S.E.2d 372, 375 (Ct. App. 2002) (holding that in order for an issue to be
preserved for appellate review, it must have been raised to and ruled upon by
the trial judge).

AFFIRMED.

WILLIAMS,
PIEPER, and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur. 

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.