State v. Frazier

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR
RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2),
SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Sharod Frazier, Appellant.

Appeal From Lee County

 Ralph F. Cothran, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-159

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed February
23, 2010

APPEAL DISMISSED

Senior Appellate Defender Joseph L. Savitz, III, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J.
Zelenka, all of Columbia; Solicitor Cecil Kelly Jackson, of Sumter, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Sharod Frazier appeals his convictions and sentences for murder, armed
robbery, criminal conspiracy, and possession of a firearm during the commission
of a violent crime, arguing the State made an improper remark during closing
argument and the trial court failed to issue an appropriate curative
instruction.  Frazier's counsel attached
a petition to be relieved as counsel, stating that he reviewed the record and
concluded the appeal lacked merit.  After a review of the record and counsel's
brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State
v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] Frazier's appeal and grant counsel's petition to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

SHORT,
THOMAS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case
without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.