CourtListener 10153299•State v. Mark Williams
Texto completo
THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State,
Respondent,
v.
Mark E.
Williams,
Appellant.
__________
Appeal From Spartanburg County
John C. Hayes, III, Circuit Court Judge
__________
Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-153
Submitted February 1, 2010 Filed
February 23, 2010
__________
AFFIRMED
__________
Appellate Defender Elizabeth A.
Franklin-Best, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, and Assistant Attorney General Michelle Parsons, all of Columbia; and
Solicitor Harold W. Gowdy, III, of Spartanburg, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Mark E. Williams appeals his guilty pleas
and sentences for first-degree criminal sexual conduct, armed robbery,
carjacking, and kidnapping, arguing the plea court erred in permitting the
mayor of Spartanburg to speak at the plea hearing. We affirm[1] pursuant to
Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authority: State v. Williams, 303
S.C. 410, 411, 401 S.E.2d 168, 169 (1991) (issues not raised to or ruled upon
by the trial court will not be considered on appeal).
AFFIRMED.
PIEPER,
GEATHERS, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.