CourtListener 10153256•State v. Travis Bigger
Texto completo
THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Travis J.
Bigger, Appellant.
Appeal from York County
Roger L. Couch, Special Circuit Court
Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-030
Submitted January 4, 2010 Filed January
25, 2010
APPEAL DISMISSED
Appellant Defender Kathrine H. Hudgins, South
Carolina Commission on Indigent Defense, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Assistant Chief Legal Counsel J. Benjamin
Aplin, South Carolina Department of Probation, Parole and Pardon Services, of
Columbia, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Travis J. Bigger appeals his community
supervision revocation, arguing that insufficient evidence was presented to
show that he violated a condition of his community supervision program. After
thoroughly reviewing the record and counsel's brief pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss Bigger's appeal and grant counsel's
petition to be relieved.[1]
APPEAL
DISMISSED.
HUFF, A.C.J.,
GEATHERS, J. and CURETON, A.J., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.