Barbara S. v. Kimberly G.

CourtListener 10153253Scctapp26 de jan. de 2010

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO
PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY
PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

Barbara S. and
Thomas S., Respondents,

v.

Kimberly G. and
David W., Defendants.

Of Whom David W.
is the Appellant.

In the Interest
of B.W., a Minor Child under the age of 18.

Appeal From Lexington County

 Richard W. Chewning, III, Family Court
Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-044

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed January
26, 2010   

AFFIRMED

Angela G. Strickland, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Kenneth M. Mathews, of Columbia, for Respondents.

Mollie DuPriest Taylor, of Columbia, for Guardian Ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: David W. appeals the family court's order
terminating his parental rights to his minor child.  See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (2008).  Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law, pursuant to Ex Parte
Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues
warrant briefing.  Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and grant
counsel's motion to be relieved.  

AFFIRMED.[1]

WILLIAMS, KONDUROS, JJ.,
and CURETON, A.J., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.