State v. Jonathan Barnhill

THIS
OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Jonathan
Barnhill, Appellant.

 

Appeal From Horry County

Steven H. John, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-051

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed January
27, 2010   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of
Columbia,  for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief
Deputy Attorney General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General
Salley W. Elliott, all of Columbia; and John Gregory Hembree, of Conway, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Jonathan
Barnhill appeals his conviction for receiving stolen goods, arguing the trial
court's charge on reasonable doubt was erroneous.  He also filed a pro se
brief.  After a thorough review of the
record and both briefs pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
(1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we
dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS,
and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.