CourtListener 10153231•State v. Sarratt
Texto completo
THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN
ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
The State, Respondent,
v.
Michael A.
Sarratt, Appellant.
Appeal From Greenville County
Edward W. Miller, Circuit Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-046
Submitted January 4, 2010 Filed January
27, 2010
APPEAL DISMISSED
Senior Appellate Defender Joseph L. Savitz, III, of Columbia, for
Appellant.
Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, Assistant Deputy Attorney General Donald J. Zelenka, all
of Columbia; and Solicitor Robert Mills Ariail, of Greenville, for Respondent.
PER CURIAM: Michael
Sarratt appeals his convictions for murder, car-jacking, and possession of a
weapon during the commission of a violent crime. Sarratt's counsel argues the
trial court erred in denying Sarratt's motion for mistrial. Sarratt filed a
pro se brief asserting numerous issues. After
a thorough review of the record and both briefs pursuant to Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and State v. Williams, 305 S.C.
116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss[1] the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.
APPEAL DISMISSED.
SHORT,
THOMAS, and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.
[1] We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to
Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.