State v. Rivers

CourtListener 10153223Scctapp28 de jan. de 2010

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION
HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE.  IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS
PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA

In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Keena Lamont Rivers, Appellant.

Appeal From Marlboro County

 Edward B. Cottingham, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2010-UP-064

Submitted January 4, 2010 – Filed January
28, 2010   

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Robert M. Pachak, of Columbia, for Appellant.

Attorney General Henry Dargan McMaster, Chief Deputy Attorney
General John W. McIntosh, and Assistant Deputy Attorney General Salley W.
Elliott, all of Columbia; Solicitor Jay E. Hodge, Jr., of Cheraw, for
Respondent.

PER CURIAM:  Keena
Rivers appeals his consecutive sentences of twelve years, three years, and one
year for possession with intent to distribute crack cocaine, failure to stop
for a blue light, and possession of marijuana, respectively.  Rivers argues the
trial court erred by not allowing him to present a defense.  After a thorough review of the record, and
counsel's brief,  pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967)
and State v. Williams, 305 S.C. 116, 406 S.E.2d 357 (1991), we dismiss
the appeal and grant counsel's motion to be relieved.[1]

APPEAL
DISMISSED.

SHORT, THOMAS,
and KONDUROS, JJ., concur.

[1] We decide this case without oral argument
pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.