SCDSS v. Antonio Marsh

CourtListener 10152913Scctapp5 de dez. de 2023

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Cherish Lemmonds and Antonio Marsh, Defendants,

Of whom Antonio Marsh is the Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2023-000719

Appeal From Lancaster County
Debra A. Matthews, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2023-UP-391
Submitted December 5, 2023 – Filed December 5, 2023

AFFIRMED

Nancy Carol Fennell, of Irmo, for Appellant.

Tracy L. Bomar-Howze, of The Howze Law Firm, of
Rock Hill; and Angela Michelle Killian, of South
Carolina Department of Social Services, of Lancaster,
both for Respondent.
Susan Margaret Johnston, of Columbia, for the Guardian
ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Antonio Marsh appeals the family court's final order terminating
his parental rights to his minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp.
2023). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of
fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly,
we affirm the family court's ruling.

AFFIRMED. 1

WILLIAMS, C.J., and HEWITT and VERDIN, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.