CourtListener 10152620•SCDSS v. Kent Noon
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Alyssa Dishneau and Kent Noon, Defendants,
Of whom Kent Noon is the Appellant.
In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2022-001319
Appeal From Horry County
Jan B. Bromell Holmes, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2023-UP-073
Submitted February 15, 2023 – Filed February 27, 2023
AFFIRMED
Harry A. Hancock, of Columbia, for Appellant.
William Evan Reynolds, of Kingstree, for Respondent.
Heather Marie Moore, of Axelrod & Associates, PA, of
Myrtle Beach, for the Guardian ad Litem.
PER CURIAM: Kent Noon appeals the family court's final order terminating his
parental rights to his minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp.
2022). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of
fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly,
we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Noon's counsel.
AFFIRMED. 1
KONDUROS and VINSON, JJ., and LOCKEMY, A.J., concur.
1
We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.