SCDSS v. Moreau

CourtListener 10152243Scctapp18 de mar. de 2022

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Janell Moreau and Jeffery Leviner, Defendants,

Of whom Janell Moreau is the Appellant.

In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2021-000928

Appeal From Greenville County
Jessica Ann Salvini, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-144
Submitted March 17, 2022 – Filed March 18, 2022

AFFIRMED

John Brandt Rucker and Allyson Sue Rucker, of The
Rucker Law Firm, LLC, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Matthew P. Head, of Head Law Firm, LLC, of
Greenville, as the Guardian ad Litem for Appellant.
Amanda Stiles, of South Carolina Department of Social
Services, of Greenville, for Respondent.

Robert A. Clark, of Greenville, for the Guardian ad
Litem for the children.

PER CURIAM: Janell Moreau appeals the family court's final order terminating
her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp.
2021). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of
fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly,
we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Moreau's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

WILLIAMS, C.J., and KONDUROS and VINSON, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.