State v. Donald Frank Halstead, III

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

The State, Respondent,

v.

Donald Frank Halstead, III, Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2019-001863

Appeal From Horry County
D. Craig Brown, Circuit Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2022-UP-122
Submitted January 1, 2022 – Filed March 23, 2022

APPEAL DISMISSED

Appellate Defender Adam Sinclair Ruffin, of Columbia,
and Donald Frank Halstead, III, pro se, both for
Appellant.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson and Senior
Assistant Deputy Attorney General William M. Blitch,
Jr., both of Columbia, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Dismissed after consideration of Appellant's pro se brief and
review pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Counsel's motion to
be relieved is granted.
APPEAL DISMISSED.1

WILLIAMS, C.J., MCDONALD, J., and LOCKEMY, A.J., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.