CourtListener 10152105•SCDSS v. Jackie Bragg
Texto completo
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals
South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,
v.
Jackie Bragg and Matthew Bragg, Defendants,
Of whom Jackie Bragg is the Appellant.
In the interest of minors under the age of eighteen.
Appellate Case No. 2020-001598
Appeal From Oconee County
Karen F. Ballenger, Family Court Judge
Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-444
Submitted December 9, 2021 – Filed December 13, 2021
AFFIRMED
Kimberly Yancey Brooks, of Kimberly Y. Brooks,
Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for Appellant.
Andrew Troy Potter, of Anderson, for Respondent.
Kimberly Welchel Pease, of Seneca, for the Guardian ad
Litem.
PER CURIAM: Jackie Bragg appeals the family court's final order terminating
her parental rights to her minor children. See S.C. Code Ann. § 63-7-2570 (Supp.
2020). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family court's findings of
fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291 S.C. 465, 354
S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing. Accordingly,
we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Bragg's counsel.
AFFIRMED. 1
KONDUROS, HILL, and HEWITT, JJ., concur.
1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.
Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude
Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.