SCDSS v. Slade

CourtListener 10151815Scctapp6 de abr. de 2021

Abrir fonte

Texto completo

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE
CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING
EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Court of Appeals

South Carolina Department of Social Services,
Respondent,

v.

Lakesha C. Slade and William Roseboro, Defendants,

Of whom Lakesha C. Slade is the Appellant.

In the interest of a minor under the age of eighteen.

Appellate Case No. 2020-001330

Appeal From York County
David G. Guyton, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2021-UP-114
Submitted March 18, 2021 – Filed April 6, 2021

AFFIRMED

Kimberly Yancey Brooks, of Kimberly Y. Brooks,
Attorney at Law, of Greenville, for Appellant.

Kathryn J. Walsh, of South Carolina Department of
Social Services, of Rock Hill; and Andrew Troy Potter,
of Anderson, for Respondent.
Donae Alecia Minor, of Minor Law Offices LLC, of Fort
Mill; and Rebecca T. McNerney, of Waxhaw, North
Carolina, for the Guardian ad Litem.

PER CURIAM: Lakesha C. Slade appeals the family court's final order
terminating her parental rights to her minor child. See S.C. Code Ann.
§ 63-7-2570 (Supp. 2020). Upon a thorough review of the record and the family
court's findings of fact and conclusions of law pursuant to Ex parte Cauthen, 291
S.C. 465, 354 S.E.2d 381 (1987), we find no meritorious issues warrant briefing.
Accordingly, we affirm the family court's ruling and relieve Slade's counsel.

AFFIRMED.1

LOCKEMY, C.J., and HUFF and HEWITT, JJ., concur.

1
We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.

Continue sua pesquisa no ChatGPT ou Claude

Conecte o Omnilex para pesquisar o corpus jurídico pelo seu assistente de IA.